Subscribe to Trade & ISDS News

Stay Up to Date on Canadian Trade Issues

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

Members of our team have appeared as counsel to the Government of Mexico in claims under NAFTA Chapter Eleven:

Vento Motorcycles, Inc. v. Mexico
Joshua Dean Nelson et al v. Mexico
B-Mex, LLP et al v. Mexico
Lion Mexico Consolidated LP v. Mexico
KBR, Inc v. Mexico
Cargill, Inc v. Mexico
Archer Daniels Midland et al v. Mexico
Corn Products International v. Mexico
Bayview Irrigation District et al v. Mexico
Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Mexico
International Thunderbird Gaming Corp v. Mexico
GAMI Investments Inc. v. Mexico
Waste Management Inc v. Mexico (II)
Marvin Roy Feldman v. Mexico
Waste Management Inc. v. Mexico (I)
Metalclad Corporation v. Mexico
Robert Azinian et al v. Mexico

And under Mexico’s bilateral investment treaties:

PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd. v.Mexico
Eutelsat, S.A. v. Mexico
Shanara Maritime International et al v. Mexico
Telefonica S.A. v. Mexico
Abengoa, S.A. v. Mexico
Gemplus S.A. v. Mexico
Talsud S.A. v. Mexico
Técnicas Medioambientales S.A. (Tecmed) v. Mexico

And as advisor to Mexico as an intervener on questions of interpretation of the NAFTA:

Resolute Forest Products v. Canada
Eli Lilly & Company v. Canada
Windstream Energy LLC v. Canada
Mercer International Inc v. Canada
Merrill & Ring Forestry LP v. Canada
United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. Canada
S.D. Myers, Inc v. Canada
Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Canada
Ethyl Corporation v. Canada

Members of our team have also advised Canadian mining, petroleum exploration and financial services industries, among others, in connection with potential investment treaty claims.